Tactical Scope Sight In

DESIGN AND CONTROVERSY CONTROVERSY CONCERNING THE REPLY FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SECURITY SECTION OF THE MOUTH OF THE RIO SAN JEROME

Il Signor Luigi Frau in una sua recente interrogazione al Sindaco del comune di Capoterra afferma che, “ da qualche giorno è costantemente subissato di telefonate effettuate da cittadini che abitano a Rio San Gerolamo che manifestano una certa preoccupazione dopo aver appreso che il Progetto per la “Messa in sicurezza idraulica del quartiere San Girolamo e delle infrastrutture viarie, del quartiere Frutti d’Oro, della foce e del ponte sul Rio Masoni Ollastu”, avrebbe subito delle modifiche sostanziali. Infatti, se dovessero corrispondere al vero le notizie pubblicate sul sito dell’Associazione October 22, at the City Council approved the project and later in Services Conference, should have been changed significantly enough to be considered new connotations with the number 04 . "Then after pointing out that the resolution of the City Council Capoterra (No. 15 of 03/29/2010) " while recognizing the validity of the 03 project, which involved a large number of relocations " proposed the adoption of resolution 2002 stated "that some leaders of October 22 was attended, it seems, to a "Conference of Services" which has become necessary to remedy in the design errors found in that period just behind the second anniversary of the event ", asked the mayor if" given the time elapsed between the call of the day on Nov. 4 and the day on which the present is learned of more disturbing news about the veracity of the rumors about the relocation and then further modifying Project 02. "

do not know what the Mayor has responded to the question of Mr. Frau.

Instead, we know that is not secret but it is written very clearly in Resolution No. 1 OF 22.04.2010 committees established by the 'AUTHORITY' OF REGIONAL BASIN.

( http://www.regione.sardegna.it/documenti/1_38_20100520132036.pdf )

Subject: Analysis of the physical condition of the Rio San Girolamo-Mason Ollastu following the event of flooding of October 22, 2008. Review and integration of the study called Plan Sketch of river belts, for testing the boundaries of the river belts and the identification of actions necessary first (structures, constraints and directives), to achieve a set of course d’acqua compatibile con la sicurezza idraulica del territorio e la salvaguardia delle componenti naturali e ambientali. (Ordinanza n. 9 del 30.12.2008 del Commissario Delegato per l’emergenza alluvione in Sardegna del 22 ottobre 2008).

(...)

CONSIDERATO che il giorno 04.12.2009 si è svolta apposita fase di presentazione pubblica, nella quale Direzione di Progetto e Consulenza Scientifica e il rappresentante del Raggruppamento di imprese incaricato hanno illustrato dettagliatamente le prime risultanze dello studio in argomento relative alla “Proposta assetto infrastrutturale base. " At the presentation has been called the City of Capoterra who participated with the Mayor, other Councillors and Aldermen, the City University of Cagliari consultants and representatives of the "October 22"

(.. .)

WHEREAS, on 15.04.2010, at the office of the Regional Public Works, in the presence of the Secretary-Basin Authority, Councillor of the LL . PP., representing the Institutional Committee, met with the Mayor and two Councillors of the City of Capoterra and that in such a place were further emphasize the peculiarities of the three approaches, especially in terms of maintenance of works and safety. In particular, partial integration of the resolutions adopted by the City Council Capoterra with Act No. 15 of 29.03.2010, the directors have been the opportunity to further integrate the optimal design by providing a channel dimensionally consistent with solution 2 supplemented with riverside areas consistent with the third variant solution B, doing this also to be aware about the higher maintenance costs resulting from this proposal, was also represented the opportunity to change the configuration of the access road to the neighborhood San Girolamo, realizzandola attraverso la strada dei Genovesi anziché con la bretella di nuova realizzazione ipotizzata nello studio proposto dal raggruppamento incaricato.

(...).

TENUTO CONTO che in sede di discussione preliminare alla votazione, l’assessore Giuliano Uras ha espresso parere favorevole alla approvazione della ipotesi progettuale (...) denominata soluzione proposta n°3 variante B, mentre gli altri componenti del Comitato Istituzionale presenti hanno concordemente ritenuto di individuare quale ipotesi di intervento da attuare quella che preveda un alveo dimensionalmente coerente 2 (...) but with the solution path with the axis of the stream and use of the riverside areas consistent with the B variant of solution 3;

RESOLUTION

1) to determine which possible interventions to be implemented, subject to the necessary depth planning by the Councillor for Public Works, owner of the implementation of interventions, el 'acquisition of required permits, including a one dimensional channel consistent with solution 2 in the study developed by The Consortium Intecno - DHI Turin, spa and ART Hydrodata Environment Resources Land Ltd. "path but with the axis of the stream and use of the riverside areas consistent with the solution 3 variant B;

This has been reiterated in Institutional Committee discussions N. 1 OF 22/09/2010 ( http://www.regione.sardegna.it/documenti/1_19_20101004191542.pdf )

In the paper published on our website There is the possibility of intervention that "provides a channel dimensionally consistent with solution 2" (...) but with the axis of the stream path and utilization of riverside areas consistent with the B variant of solution 3 .

Then in April it was known what now seems like a novelty.

The thing that leaves us baffled is to learn that some representatives of our Association were participating in a phantom Services Conference which has become necessary for correcting the design errors found in the latter period, just behind the second anniversary of the event.

The only conference where some services to representatives of participating is that of 22ottobre 04.12.2009 (as also documented in the resolution), where, however, was also present Mr. Frau.

In summary, the study presented in April by the company Hydrodata see the following design solutions for the valley section:

Solution 01 - the first made in the study Hydrodata version in November 2009, hotly contested by all because created the basin in closed quarters.

Solution 2 - Alveo 50-m section and up to 1 m high levees - relocation reduced to a few buildings: sole mother in front of the school basement, greenhouse, electric cabin, farm, farm fruit d 'Gold, Leeward Bar, Retail Lumber and swimming pools - New way to access the area of \u200b\u200bthe district Rio S. Jerome with the insertion of a new roundabout - solution requested by the town but considered the worst by the same hydraulic engineers Hydrodata

Solution 3A and 3B - from riverbed 30 m section, up to 1.5 m high embankments - largest relocation in the right side of the subdivision S. Jerome with several homes to be rebuilt - Access road to the district Rio S. Jerome who follows the old route of the Genoese.

Solution 4 - channel 50-m section of the relocation of three buildings, two houses, the rest are always the same - Increased protection of the left bank upstream of the nursery (area Serre Peron) - Access road to the district Rio S. Jerome who follows the old route of the Genoese.

(see previous post)

La delibera n. 1 del Comitato Istituzionale dell’autorità di bacino regionale del 22 aprile 2010 (ripeto 22 aprile 2010) decide che l’ipotesi di intervento da attuare è la Soluzione 4.

Questi sono i fatti, tutto il resto sono chiacchiere.

Antonio Sau