Thursday, December 9 was held in the parish of golden fruit, a meeting organized by the Movement Capoterra: Solidarity - an equal partner, between the commissioner and the population of Sannittu Capoterra. The meeting was well described by Joseph Pala.
Maybe because we were in church, more which discussed the state of the art safety measures of the Rio San Gerolamo seemed a political liturgy (with the lowercase p). Deference toward power, rallies and special interests that exceed the generals.
After the customary greetings, the main debate has shifted to whether or not the possible relocation of some houses. It was shown in the paper (taken from the site of 22Ottobre) where he was shown the solution proposed in the preliminary study by Hydrodata for the area of \u200b\u200bthe mouth.
Assessor Sannitu pointed out that all that circulates in the network belongs to preliminary study, the preliminary draft will be delivered to regional offices (the company Hydrodata, the same who performed the preliminary study , in charge of the project) in about two weeks.
implied, nothing is true, the houses (two houses and a basement) will not be touched.
was the answer that everyone wanted to hear. Ignoring
April 22, 2010 as decided by the Institutional Committee of the Regional Basin which, remember, resolution to determine which hypothesis intervention to be implemented that provides a channel (...) dimensionally consistent with solution 2 in the study developed by the Consortium Intecno - DHI Turin, spa and ART Hydrodata Environment Resources Land Ltd. "path but with the axis of the stream and use of the riverside areas consistent with the solution 3 variant B.
one shown in the paper. Alveo from 50 m. Path of the solution 3b which provides the relocation of three houses.
Plough and pasture.
There is an old saying that says that one can not plow the same ground to graze at the same time (actually there are some versions' more direct ... !!!).
Similarly those who govern us (and church representatives were present various regional institutions and municipal) and those who would govern, claims to be able to plow and grazing.
The resolution says what must be the possibility of intervention. The preliminary draft will follow this assumption.
But this can not be told why you should not upset anyone.
No politician has had the courage to say that if we want more than St. Jerome does not come into our homes, we can not expect them to be in the River.
No politician has had the courage to say that sometimes the common good is more important than the particular good.
No politician wanted to say that the houses will be torn down and people left street, but will be relocated , that the houses should be rebuilt in another location (safe) at the expense of the administration.
No politician wanted to open a discussion so that, if it comes to the choice of having to relocate the houses, has already done to identify the areas and discussed how much money we have available for reconstruction.
Plough and pasture.
It seems that in politics it means not to displease anyone, but this inevitably leads to not take any decision or take the easiest and less reasoned.
This means that, even for an important work such as that of hydrogeologic reorganization of the Rio San Girolamo, it takes, to make everyone happy, hasty decisions.
It was therefore decided that, instead of making a first preliminary draft homogeneous on the whole river bed, has been taken in reliance on the preliminary draft "from the mouth of the Rio San Girolamo up to ... where the insufficient money, presumably until the SS 195. "
But, you can make a project where up enough money "?? It's a bit 'as if I asked you: I am a project for a building of 10 floors, but you stop when you get € 10,000 cost of construction? Fa 10500, I do, I leave? No, not nothing, take it!
Or you have not said that the plan preliminary geological rearrangement of the Rio San Girolamo performed by Hydrodata you want to use as preliminary draft.
Actually, when Alderman was asked how he would be dealt with the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) of the work, Mr. Piras, "service manager who is responsible to follow the work" ( Councillor words), he replied that they would ask for a simplified procedure for the area currently in draft and then, with regard to other areas, will be used plan (as fosse un progetto ) di riassetto idrogeologico del Rio San Girolamo. Arare e pascolare.
La confusione tra piano e progetto non nasce dai documenti presenti in Internet (che qualcuno vorrebbe, non si sa come e perché togliere) ma da come vengono usati tali termini.
Per quanto riguarda il ruolo dell’amministrazione comunale, in casi come questi, oltre dare parere (non vincolante, ricordiamocelo anche se siamo ormai in campagna elettorale!) sui progetti proposti, dovrebbe agire affinché il bene comune prevalga sugli interessi particolari, cercando di trovare le soluzioni migliori per tutti anche se scontentano qualcuno.
Torno Finally, the promise made on the Councillor Sannittu construction start date. By next summer. Remembering the promise of the previous commissioner of public works (Card, who had promised to start work in early summer 2010) and as written by Rita Lai Blog 22ottobre Association regarding the timing of a design of a real ' work like that, I asked for confirmation alderman on the timing of interventions. The commissioner has confirmed the start of work for next summer. We will monitor.
will monitor mainly because it can not be more politicians (regional or local authorities that they are) who claim to plowing and grazing.
Antonio Sau
0 comments:
Post a Comment