
Monday, December 27, 2010
How To Make A Rabbit Waterer

Tuesday, December 14, 2010
Numbers On The Bottom Of Le Cruset?
Thursday, December 9 was held in the parish of golden fruit, a meeting organized by the Movement Capoterra: Solidarity - an equal partner, between the commissioner and the population of Sannittu Capoterra. The meeting was well described by Joseph Pala.
Maybe because we were in church, more which discussed the state of the art safety measures of the Rio San Gerolamo seemed a political liturgy (with the lowercase p). Deference toward power, rallies and special interests that exceed the generals.
After the customary greetings, the main debate has shifted to whether or not the possible relocation of some houses. It was shown in the paper (taken from the site of 22Ottobre) where he was shown the solution proposed in the preliminary study by Hydrodata for the area of \u200b\u200bthe mouth.
Assessor Sannitu pointed out that all that circulates in the network belongs to preliminary study, the preliminary draft will be delivered to regional offices (the company Hydrodata, the same who performed the preliminary study , in charge of the project) in about two weeks.
implied, nothing is true, the houses (two houses and a basement) will not be touched.
was the answer that everyone wanted to hear. Ignoring
April 22, 2010 as decided by the Institutional Committee of the Regional Basin which, remember, resolution to determine which hypothesis intervention to be implemented that provides a channel (...) dimensionally consistent with solution 2 in the study developed by the Consortium Intecno - DHI Turin, spa and ART Hydrodata Environment Resources Land Ltd. "path but with the axis of the stream and use of the riverside areas consistent with the solution 3 variant B.
one shown in the paper. Alveo from 50 m. Path of the solution 3b which provides the relocation of three houses.
Plough and pasture.
There is an old saying that says that one can not plow the same ground to graze at the same time (actually there are some versions' more direct ... !!!).
Similarly those who govern us (and church representatives were present various regional institutions and municipal) and those who would govern, claims to be able to plow and grazing.
The resolution says what must be the possibility of intervention. The preliminary draft will follow this assumption.
But this can not be told why you should not upset anyone.
No politician has had the courage to say that if we want more than St. Jerome does not come into our homes, we can not expect them to be in the River.
No politician has had the courage to say that sometimes the common good is more important than the particular good.
No politician wanted to say that the houses will be torn down and people left street, but will be relocated , that the houses should be rebuilt in another location (safe) at the expense of the administration.
No politician wanted to open a discussion so that, if it comes to the choice of having to relocate the houses, has already done to identify the areas and discussed how much money we have available for reconstruction.
Plough and pasture.
It seems that in politics it means not to displease anyone, but this inevitably leads to not take any decision or take the easiest and less reasoned.
This means that, even for an important work such as that of hydrogeologic reorganization of the Rio San Girolamo, it takes, to make everyone happy, hasty decisions.
It was therefore decided that, instead of making a first preliminary draft homogeneous on the whole river bed, has been taken in reliance on the preliminary draft "from the mouth of the Rio San Girolamo up to ... where the insufficient money, presumably until the SS 195. "
But, you can make a project where up enough money "?? It's a bit 'as if I asked you: I am a project for a building of 10 floors, but you stop when you get € 10,000 cost of construction? Fa 10500, I do, I leave? No, not nothing, take it!
Or you have not said that the plan preliminary geological rearrangement of the Rio San Girolamo performed by Hydrodata you want to use as preliminary draft.
Actually, when Alderman was asked how he would be dealt with the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) of the work, Mr. Piras, "service manager who is responsible to follow the work" ( Councillor words), he replied that they would ask for a simplified procedure for the area currently in draft and then, with regard to other areas, will be used plan (as fosse un progetto ) di riassetto idrogeologico del Rio San Girolamo. Arare e pascolare.
La confusione tra piano e progetto non nasce dai documenti presenti in Internet (che qualcuno vorrebbe, non si sa come e perché togliere) ma da come vengono usati tali termini.
Per quanto riguarda il ruolo dell’amministrazione comunale, in casi come questi, oltre dare parere (non vincolante, ricordiamocelo anche se siamo ormai in campagna elettorale!) sui progetti proposti, dovrebbe agire affinché il bene comune prevalga sugli interessi particolari, cercando di trovare le soluzioni migliori per tutti anche se scontentano qualcuno.
Torno Finally, the promise made on the Councillor Sannittu construction start date. By next summer. Remembering the promise of the previous commissioner of public works (Card, who had promised to start work in early summer 2010) and as written by Rita Lai Blog 22ottobre Association regarding the timing of a design of a real ' work like that, I asked for confirmation alderman on the timing of interventions. The commissioner has confirmed the start of work for next summer. We will monitor.
will monitor mainly because it can not be more politicians (regional or local authorities that they are) who claim to plowing and grazing.
Antonio Sau
Monday, December 6, 2010
No Default Application Sims 2 Install Mac
Wednesday, December 1, 2010
Rules For The Card Game Fustration
To complete the picture shows clear from our President Antonio Sau, on the history and authorship of the decisions taken, which showed conclusively that the Association on October 22, had no effect on the deliberations of the the Institutional Committee of the Basin, and never has participated in conferences held in recent months of service, I would like to make some considerations.
alarmed citizens are probably shaking at all, as Mr. Frau.
fact that map (solution 4) with red dots, which indicate the objects to be demolished and relocate, is nothing more than a plan di massima delle cose da fare, di tutte le opere da eseguire, dei sottoservizi da spostare ecc.
Gli addetti ai lavori ovviamente sanno perfettamente che quello NON E’ AFFATTO IL PROGETTO CHE SARÀ REALIZZATO . Infatti per progettare gli INTERVENTI REALI saranno necessari rilievi topografici di dettaglio, e non certo una foto aerea stampata in quella scala; saranno necessarie indagini geognostiche specifiche in profondità e non certo i sondaggi in corso, finalizzati alla caratterizzazione dello stato di inquinamento dei terreni superficiali; saranno necessari studi sulle mappe catastali per verificare esattamente la posizione dell’alveo e degli argini, dei manufatti e delle case; saranno necessari diversi stadi Resuming the project from the preliminary final to the executive, during which you can perform inspections in places of design in order to study the exact path of the new flume (not to the river) you will build with the work of made safe.
By this I mean that the three houses that are shown in the paper with the red ball along the right bank of the river at the kindergarten, maybe the end result that the design will all be standing there without any demolition and reconstruction or maybe just simply relocate.
mean to say that only after the design is able to understand really what will become of all that area.
The worrying thing however, this means that should alarm people is the fact that currently the only portion of the bed that you're going to design is a stretch of the riverbed between the SS 195 and the mouth and that the rest still do not even speak.
After two years and after several resolutions and ordinances, yet in reality it is continuing to postpone the integral design of the necessary interventions for security of the entire auction river, from mountain slopes to the mouth. I should mention that the gloss is well known: "defends the plain in the mountains" while it is true the opposite, because the water comes down from the mountains with its load of sand, stones and vegetation, and pours this burden on the plain and into the riverbed. S and does not stop this transfer from upstream to downstream and left free to wander the river, carrying hundreds of thousands of cubic meters of sediment at the most intense rainfall, the problem will never be solved.
Instead of preparing a preliminary draft and consistent from upstream to downstream, as the Association has asked October 22 at the time in documents filed with the competent authorities (see our blog in January 2010 http://22ottobre. blogspot.com/2010_01_01_archive.html) it was decided to make a stew of interventions, but we do not know what to do with timing which activates the design and implementation of interventions. So the opposite of what we did for the Rio S. Lucia, in which the project had been unified and made in batches.
The other defeat on the front instead of the environment is the type of resection of the riverbed has been chosen: a river bed turned into a canal that the river will no longer have anything, forced by the banks and ground stiff, devoid of any natural, with little or impossible to availability of places. In spite to all the principles of bioengineering and the design carried out by following these principles and which occurs in half of Europe for decades now. Forget
short for that stretch of river that we can talk about "River Park" and renaturation of the riverbed. What we see is a canyon section trapezoidal, with its banks lined with gabions filled with stones and metal with the bottom that will soon be filled with lush reeds in the long run will block the flow section, especially if maintenance, paid for entirely by City Council will not be made consistently every year.
He was not sure why the Association on October 22 auspicava venisse fatto per la soluzione dei problemi e per la messa in sicurezza del territorio.
Tactical Scope Sight In
do not know what the Mayor has responded to the question of Mr. Frau.
Instead, we know that is not secret but it is written very clearly in Resolution No. 1 OF 22.04.2010 committees established by the 'AUTHORITY' OF REGIONAL BASIN.
( http://www.regione.sardegna.it/documenti/1_38_20100520132036.pdf )
Subject: Analysis of the physical condition of the Rio San Girolamo-Mason Ollastu following the event of flooding of October 22, 2008. Review and integration of the study called Plan Sketch of river belts, for testing the boundaries of the river belts and the identification of actions necessary first (structures, constraints and directives), to achieve a set of course d’acqua compatibile con la sicurezza idraulica del territorio e la salvaguardia delle componenti naturali e ambientali. (Ordinanza n. 9 del 30.12.2008 del Commissario Delegato per l’emergenza alluvione in Sardegna del 22 ottobre 2008).
(...)
CONSIDERATO che il giorno 04.12.2009 si è svolta apposita fase di presentazione pubblica, nella quale Direzione di Progetto e Consulenza Scientifica e il rappresentante del Raggruppamento di imprese incaricato hanno illustrato dettagliatamente le prime risultanze dello studio in argomento relative alla “Proposta assetto infrastrutturale base. " At the presentation has been called the City of Capoterra who participated with the Mayor, other Councillors and Aldermen, the City University of Cagliari consultants and representatives of the "October 22"
(.. .)
WHEREAS, on 15.04.2010, at the office of the Regional Public Works, in the presence of the Secretary-Basin Authority, Councillor of the LL . PP., representing the Institutional Committee, met with the Mayor and two Councillors of the City of Capoterra and that in such a place were further emphasize the peculiarities of the three approaches, especially in terms of maintenance of works and safety. In particular, partial integration of the resolutions adopted by the City Council Capoterra with Act No. 15 of 29.03.2010, the directors have been the opportunity to further integrate the optimal design by providing a channel dimensionally consistent with solution 2 supplemented with riverside areas consistent with the third variant solution B, doing this also to be aware about the higher maintenance costs resulting from this proposal, was also represented the opportunity to change the configuration of the access road to the neighborhood San Girolamo, realizzandola attraverso la strada dei Genovesi anziché con la bretella di nuova realizzazione ipotizzata nello studio proposto dal raggruppamento incaricato.
(...).
TENUTO CONTO che in sede di discussione preliminare alla votazione, l’assessore Giuliano Uras ha espresso parere favorevole alla approvazione della ipotesi progettuale (...) denominata soluzione proposta n°3 variante B, mentre gli altri componenti del Comitato Istituzionale presenti hanno concordemente ritenuto di individuare quale ipotesi di intervento da attuare quella che preveda un alveo dimensionalmente coerente 2 (...) but with the solution path with the axis of the stream and use of the riverside areas consistent with the B variant of solution 3;
RESOLUTION
1) to determine which possible interventions to be implemented, subject to the necessary depth planning by the Councillor for Public Works, owner of the implementation of interventions, el 'acquisition of required permits, including a one dimensional channel consistent with solution 2 in the study developed by The Consortium Intecno - DHI Turin, spa and ART Hydrodata Environment Resources Land Ltd. "path but with the axis of the stream and use of the riverside areas consistent with the solution 3 variant B;
This has been reiterated in Institutional Committee discussions N. 1 OF 22/09/2010 ( http://www.regione.sardegna.it/documenti/1_19_20101004191542.pdf )
In the paper published on our website There is the possibility of intervention that "provides a channel dimensionally consistent with solution 2" (...) but with the axis of the stream path and utilization of riverside areas consistent with the B variant of solution 3 .
Then in April it was known what now seems like a novelty.
The thing that leaves us baffled is to learn that some representatives of our Association were participating in a phantom Services Conference which has become necessary for correcting the design errors found in the latter period, just behind the second anniversary of the event.
The only conference where some services to representatives of participating is that of 22ottobre 04.12.2009 (as also documented in the resolution), where, however, was also present Mr. Frau.
In summary, the study presented in April by the company Hydrodata see the following design solutions for the valley section:
Solution 01 - the first made in the study Hydrodata version in November 2009, hotly contested by all because created the basin in closed quarters.
Solution 2 - Alveo 50-m section and up to 1 m high levees - relocation reduced to a few buildings: sole mother in front of the school basement, greenhouse, electric cabin, farm, farm fruit d 'Gold, Leeward Bar, Retail Lumber and swimming pools - New way to access the area of \u200b\u200bthe district Rio S. Jerome with the insertion of a new roundabout - solution requested by the town but considered the worst by the same hydraulic engineers Hydrodata
Solution 3A and 3B - from riverbed 30 m section, up to 1.5 m high embankments - largest relocation in the right side of the subdivision S. Jerome with several homes to be rebuilt - Access road to the district Rio S. Jerome who follows the old route of the Genoese.
Solution 4 - channel 50-m section of the relocation of three buildings, two houses, the rest are always the same - Increased protection of the left bank upstream of the nursery (area Serre Peron) - Access road to the district Rio S. Jerome who follows the old route of the Genoese.
(see previous post)
La delibera n. 1 del Comitato Istituzionale dell’autorità di bacino regionale del 22 aprile 2010 (ripeto 22 aprile 2010) decide che l’ipotesi di intervento da attuare è la Soluzione 4.
Questi sono i fatti, tutto il resto sono chiacchiere.
Antonio Sau
Friday, November 26, 2010
Greenish Black Stool Color After Maalox

Sunday, November 21, 2010
I Dont Havecervicalmucus
we citizens are forced to see you every day more or less engaged in political noble struggles of the building. There is one aspect that together, we must not forget. You are elected by us to respond to our needs. Good or bad, you were selected among Italian citizens, to take in the sumptuous palaces of Rome, the decisions that will guide our lives.

Thursday, November 4, 2010
Dd Emblema De Ragnarok
